Jack Sullivan is a Principal in the firm's Insurance Law Department. He has handled insurance coverage questions and coverage litigation for more than 45 years. Mr. Sullivan has addressed complex insurance coverage problems, including pollution claims, toxic exposure claims, bad faith claims, personal and advertising injury liability claims, and errors and omissions and professional liability claims.
He provides opinions and counseling on contract drafting, interpretation, and application, and trends in the law. Mr. Sullivan has also represented clients in cases filed throughout the United States, including cases with multi-million dollar exposures involving pollution, exposures to asbestos and other toxic substances, and commercial disparagement.
Mr. Sullivan serves as counsel to clients in a variety of industries with respect to the analysis and drafting of policy language to help ensure appropriate coverage protection. He also provides risk management analysis to clients helping them to avoid unnecessary liability exposures.
Since 2007, Mr. Sullivan has been named by his peers as a Pennsylvania Super Lawyer in the category of Insurance Coverage. He was selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® 2015, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 and 2026 editions in the category of Insurance Law. He was named a "Lawyer of the Year" in 2022 in the same category. For information about these selections and an overview of common third-party publications, rankings, and list methodologies, click here.
Read full bio >
Read less >
- Obtained dismissal of claims for insurance coverage for losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of defendant insurance company in the Western District of Pennsylvania that coverage and bad faith claims were barred by the statute of limitations. Ruling was affirmed by Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of plaintiff insurance company in the Western District of Pennsylvania suing insurer which had refused to provide defense and indemnity to additional insured. Ruling was affirmed by Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment in a case of first impression in the Kentucky state court that pro rata allocation applies to asbestos claims.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of defendant insurance company in the District of New Jersey in suit seeking coverage for commercial disparagement claims asserted in two antitrust cases in which the insured sought reimbursement of a $49 million settlement and more than $18 million in defense costs. Ruling was affirmed by the Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of plaintiff insurance company in the Western District of Pennsylvania that asbestos-related personal injury claims asserted against policyholder arose from one occurrence and that a non-cumulation provision precludes stacking coverage. Ruling was affirmed by the Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of defendant insurance company in the District of Maine in suit seeking coverage for bodily injury and property damage claims based on alleged exposure to hexavalent chromium in tanning sludge that was applied as fertilizer to farms in Missouri.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of defendant insurance company in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that abuse or molestation exclusion precludes coverage for claims against insured, a personal care home, arising out of the abuse of an elderly patient. Ruling was affirmed by the Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of defendant insurance company in the District of New Jersey in suit brought under the citizen suit provision of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6972, based, in part, on res judicata and the entire controversy doctrine. Ruling was affirmed by the Third Circuit.
- Obtained award of summary judgment on behalf of plaintiff insurance company in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that employee exclusion barred coverage for sexual harassment claims against insured even where was off duty and not actually working at the time of harassment.