Workers' Compensation Rights/ Obligations in Light of the Forced Government Shutdown Due to COVID-19
March 23, 2020
With coronavirus (COVID-19) related mandatory shutdowns in place across Pennsylvania, employers and workers’ compensation insurance carriers will face requests for reinstatement of total or partial disability benefits from employees who have returned to work following work-related injuries.
- Pennsylvania courts have held that where a claimant returns to work under a suspension or modification, with restrictions, and is subsequently laid off and seeks a reinstatement of benefits, the claimant is entitled to the presumption that his/her loss of earning power is causally related to the continuing work injury. These workers will be entitled to an automatic reinstatement of benefits.
- However, where a claimant returns to work with symptoms but without restrictions, and subsequently is laid off for economic reasons, the claimant is not automatically entitled to wage loss benefits. These workers should be required to go through the process of filing a Reinstatement Petition in order to seek a reinstatement of benefits.
- Workers who are laid off due to the forced government shutdown are entitled to Unemployment Compensation Benefits pursuant to Governor Wolf’s directive. Employers should send LIBC-750, 756 & 760 forms to all individuals who were working light-duty positions prior to the forced government shutdown. Employers should consider awaiting receipt of these completed forms prior to reinstating wage loss benefits so that there are no overpayments made as a result of an employee’s receipt of unemployment compensation benefits.
Usual strategies used by employers and workers’ compensation insurance carriers to suspend wage loss benefits should be re-evaluated in light of the forced government shut down.
- A refusal to attend an IME typically provides a basis for seeking a suspension of wage loss benefits. In light of the forced government shutdown, it is likely that Workers’ Compensation Judges will find a refusal to attend an IME at this time to be reasonable. In addition, we have been informed that many IME physicians are not performing examinations at this time.
- A refusal of reasonable and necessary medical treatment may also provide a basis for seeking a suspension of wage loss benefits. In light of the forced government shutdown, it is likely that Workers’ Compensation Judges will find a refusal of reasonable and necessary medical treatment, including but not limited to physical therapy, injections, and non-emergent surgeries, to be reasonable at this time.
- At this time, elective, non-emergent procedures and diagnostic studies are prohibited by way of Governor Wolf’s order. However, even when this ban is lifted, it is likely that many Workers’ Compensation Judges will be reluctant to force the issue until the pandemic has been officially declared over.
- Situations should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. It is recommended that Suspension Petitions be filed only in cases where a refusal of reasonable medical treatment results in clear and convincing evidence that the refusal will result, not only in a lack of improvement but also in an actual deterioration of a claimant’s condition.
Post & Schell’s Workers’ Compensation attorneys will continue to provide guidance for employers and workers’ compensation insurance carriers as this unique situation progresses. If you have questions regarding a specific claim, please contact any of the following of Post & Schell’s Workers’ Compensation Attorneys:
- Patrick T. Cusick, Principal and Chair, Workers' Compensation Department, in our Lancaster Office at (717) 391-4433 or email@example.com
- Patrick R. Byrne, Principal, in our Allentown Office at (610) 774-0326 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Patrice A. Toland, Principal, in our Philadelphia Office at (215) 587-1093 or email@example.com
- Stephen S. Bloomburg, Principal, in our Pittsburgh Office at (412) 577-2985 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Disclaimer: This post does not offer specific legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship. You should not reach any legal conclusions based on the information contained in this post without first seeking the advice of counsel.
About the Authors:
Karyn D. Rienzi is a Principal in the Firm's Appellate Department and focuses her practice exclusively on post-trial and appellate litigation in state and federal courts, as well as administrative agencies. Ms. Rienzi also works closely with trial attorneys on pre-trial and trial strategies to protect and enhance a client’s post-trial and appellate rights. Her post-trial and appellate practice includes a wide range of legal areas, including casualty, insurance coverage, construction injuries, premises liability, professional liability, products liability, and workers’ compensation. Learn More.
Jill A. Gilden focuses her practice exclusively in the defense and representation of Pennsylvania employers and insurance companies/third party administrators in workers' compensation proceedings. She handles a wide variety of disability claims arising with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania's workers' compensation system, including catastrophic loss, hearing loss, mental stress and the more typical orthopedic injury claims. Learn More.